In the Pocket: Photography from World War One

Kodak is probably the most significant name in the history of photography and it was the company that was most responsible for popularising photography, not only with its film products but also with its various easy-to-use cameras for the mass market. At one stage, photography was even called ‘Kodakery’ by some. Now that I have a collection of most camera models made by Leica, I have turned my attention to significant cameras in the history of photography such as the Nikon F and various Kodak models, such as the Brownie and the Vest Pocket Kodak (VPK) shown below.

I had intended to acquire a Vest Pocket for some time but it was this article in Amateur Photographer and the publication of the book “The Vest Pocket Kodak & the First World War: Camera and Conflict” by John Cooksey, which spurred me on to finally make a purchase:

I first bought the book which not only gives some background about the camera and its workings but also provides examples of photographs taken on the front line in World War I. The camera reached its greatest fame during the war period, when many VPKs were carried to the battlefield by soldiers. It became known to many as ‘the Soldier’s Kodak’. It is difficult to say that the battlefield images in Cooksey’s book are ‘wonderful’ in all the circumstances, but a lot of them show remarkable images taken under the most appalling circumstances. One famous set of photographs in the book depicts the famous football match on Christmas Day 1914. Cooksey’s book goes into the discomfort felt by British authorities because of the publication of such photos. This led to a general Routine Order being issued by Sir John French, Commander of Chief of the British Expeditionary Force, in December 1914 to the effect that ‘the taking of photographs is not permitted’. This led in time to a War Office Instruction in March 1915 that ‘any officers or soldiers… found in possession of a camera will be placed in arrest’. As a result of these orders the number of photographs from the front diminished. But there continued to be some from officers and soldiers and, also, as we will see later, from some chaplains as well.

The Kodak Vest Pocket Camera was introduced in 1912 and continued in production until 1926. There were several variations with different lens types described here. The main change during the life of the camera was the introduction of the Autographic Model in 1915. This involved a small door at the back with a stylus on which details could be written, which would show up on the final photograph, something that was way ahead of its time. In 1913 Kodak had paid the enormous sum of $300,000 to Henry Gaisman for his patent method of writing on film. At the time, this was the largest amount ever paid for an industrial patent. This led to the production of the special Autographic Model. The example I have is an Autographic which uses 127 film.

The 127 film available today does not have the carbon backing, so the autographic feature cannot be used. Today’s equivalent of the VPK is, of course, the smartphone. I have shown the camera folded here along with my iPhone 6 and it is remarkable how similar they are in size in plan view.

And yes, the VPK will fit in a modern shirt pocket.

Another feature of the VPK is that the camera is a ‘bottom loader’ (well ‘top loader actually or ‘side loader’ when the camera is in portrait mode) just like a Leica as this photo along with a Leica I Model A shows;

I got the manual for the camera after I had taken some photos, but the main controls, which can be seen below, are intuitive. 

The top control contains the shutter speed markings for what the manual describes as the ‘Autotime Scale Method’ with references to Brilliant, Clear, Gray, Dull and Very Dull, a bit like the famous ‘Sunny 16’ method so familiar to photographers from the film era. The timings suggested are, of course, for the film of the day, which would have been very ‘slow’ by today’s standards. ISO ratings as we know them did not exist during the period that the VPK was in production. The film I used was ISO 100 but I was able to make a good guess about exposures. The top scale shows 1/25th, B, T and 1/50th as well as suggested timings for Gray, Dull and Very Dull complete with a ‘tripod warning’. I used 1/50th as the film was much faster than that for which the camera was made. The camera does not have a focussing mechanism. The lower scale which reads, 1 Near View Portrait, 2 Average View, 3 Distant View and 4 Clouds Marine is not a distance focussing scale but, rather, it stops down the aperture, which as all good photographers know, increases the depth of field. It was a bright day when I used the camera and I largely used setting 3.

In choosing a subject or project for the camera, I wanted to get a subject, which related to World War I. The Irish National War Memorial Gardens are in Islandbridge, about four miles from my home in Dublin. The Gardens were built in the 1930s, to a design by the famous architect, Sir Edwin Lutyens. Lutyens had an Irish mother and, therefore, had some connection to the country. The gardens were originally intended to be a memorial to the 49,400 Irish persons who died in World War I but since they were built the gardens have become a memorial to Irish people who have died in all conflicts. The photo of the Visitors’ Guide below shows the wonderful layout of Lutyen’s design

The 127 film which is used in the VPK is very difficult to acquire nowadays. I used a roll of ISO 100 Rera Pan which I obtained from Nik and Trick’s Photographic Supplies in Folkestone, Kent. This is produced in Japan, by a company called Kawauso-shoten. Nik and Trick also had Rera Pan 127 film for colour slides, but because of the issues with calculating and executing exposure with the VPK, which are described above, I decided to go with the greater exposure latitude available from black and white negative film. I also wanted to get an authentic ‘1915 feel’ from my photographs. Nik and Trick also did the processing of my 127 roll for me. I might add that, as I write this, they are out of stock with both types of 127 film.

Each roll of 127 film has eight exposures on it. I, therefore, had to choose what to photograph very carefully. I had purchased two rolls and I decided I would not use the second roll until I saw the results from the first one. Generally, the shoot went well. My biggest difficulties included seeing what was in the viewfinder, which has two settings, one for portrait mode and one for landscape. I also had some difficulty with holding the camera steady because of the arthritis in my left hand. I then, however, hit a spot around frame four where I found that the film would not wind on. I think that the turning key got detached from the film spindle at that stage. I went into a shaded spot and loosened the ‘bottom plate’ and after some jiggling I got the camera winding again. Light leaks and artefacts have shown up on some frames as well as the effects of shakiness from my dodgy left hand.

I was very pleased, thrilled in fact, to find last week when I received the results back by Dropbox (sounds strange when the camera came from 1915 but perhaps it’s the next best thing to being mentioned in despatches) that 50% of the shots (all four of them) were very usable.

The first is this shot of the Temple on the outskirts of the Gardens:

The floor of this contains some lines from the poem ‘ War Sonnet II: Safety’ by Rupert Brooke

The next one, which contains some artifacts, perhaps from loosening the ‘bottom plate’ is of the Book Rooms and Pergola. I quite like the effect created by the artifacts.

These Book Rooms contain details of those who died in the conflict and other related items. The Pergola is said by some to represent an area of rest for wounded combatants.

This photo shows the central area of gardens with ponds, obelisks and walls.

The final photo shows one of two giant circular sunken rose gardens at either end of the main garden.

It is said that Lutyens had intended that the rose gardens would be tranquil memorial spots devoid of all military symbolism, but others have suggested that the sunken gardens were inspired by Roman arenas for gladiatorial combat.

My photos of the Memorial Gardens were as close as I got to World War I. The Cooksey book includes a picture of Irish soldiers at Gallipoli, specifically the Dublin Fusiliers on a beach under fire and some wounded Munster Fusiliers on board a lighter in the foreground. This is said to have been taken by a VPK. As for Irish photographers who may have used a VPK, I have looked at the work of the famous Irish Jesuit priest photographer Fr Frank Browne who has been called ‘the Irish Cartier Bresson’. These photos are contained in the book called Father Browne’s First World War. Father Browne served as a chaplain to the Irish Guards during WW I and he did take photos on the battlefield despite the Orders and Instructions mentioned above. He was, in fact, sponsored by Kodak, for reasons which I give below. I am surmising, therefore, that Father Browne did use the VPK, which seems to have been the camera of choice on the battlefield.

This photo was taken by Father Browne at Ypres in 1916 .

Another photo taken by Father Browne after the war was this one of the writer Rudyard Kipling visiting the Irish Guards in 1919

Kipling‘s son John had died in combat with the Irish Guards during the war. He had been turned down by the Royal Navy because of poor eyesight, but Kipling was friends with the Colonel of the Irish Guards and so John went into the Irish Guards. Kipling wrote a poem about his son called ‘My Boy Jack’. 

I mentioned above that Father Browne was sponsored by Kodak. He was given free film for life by Kodak. This was because he was the last person to have taken photographs (to be seen here) on board the Titanic and his photos taken on Kodak film were circulated world-wide at the time, including this one, with some double exposure, of the wireless room on the Titanic.

Father Browne had a lucky break on the Titanic, which ensured that he would live to photograph WW I and many other subjects for years to come. He travelled from Liverpool to Queenstown (now Cobh pronounced ‘Cove’) in Cork on the Titanic. On the boat he befriended a wealthy American family who offered to buy him a ticket for the onward journey to New York. He was a clerical student at the time and he had to telegraph his Provincial (religious superior) in order to get permission to travel. When he arrived in Cobh he received the following terse response by telegraph ‘Get off that ship — Provincial’. Thus he survived the sinking of the Titanic and went on to photograph World War I and a great many other events and places. I wonder, though, whether the Jesuits knew something about the ultimate fate of the Titanic

Going back to the Memorial Gardens, I had brought a 1930s Kodak Beau Brownie with some colour Portra ISO 160 120 film inside. The results were not that great due to a stiff shutter and I will do another article about the Brownie, which was another great populariser of photography. As a representative sample this photo must do.

I also took along my current main camera, a Leica M10 with a 35mm Summicron lens, as I knew that with only eight shots on a roll the VPK would take my coverage only so far. My first shot with that combination was this one of what is known as ‘The War Stone’

The inscription on the stone is a biblical one chosen by Rudyard Kipling whose son died fighting with the Irish Guards. The three chaps on the left asked me to take their photo on a smartphone (today’s VPK?). They seemed to have a huge interest in the subject of war graves, perhaps because of relatives, and they told me that they had asked in advance to enter into the Book Rooms. Because I had taken their photo together, they asked me if I would like to join them in the guided tour of the Book Rooms.

Before we left the War Stone I took this photo of one of the wreaths, which was from the Apostolic Nunciature, which is the Vatican Embassy in Ireland. A lot of the wreaths were from Foreign Embassies as well as from the usual regimental and British Legion sources. 

In the Book Rooms we saw the volumes recording those Irish people who died in World War one. The edges of the books were decorated by the Irish artist Harry Clarke, whose speciality was stained glass windows. The light was poor in the small Book Rooms, which filled up quickly with five people. I had to shoot wide open and at an angle in order to avoid light reflections.

The largest item on display in another Book Room (there are four in all) was the wooden Ginchy Cross, which stood in a field in France, commemorating fallen members of the 16th Irish Division until the mid 1920s. When the wooden cross was replaced by a stone one, it was taken to Dublin and then placed in the Gardens when they were completed in the 1930s.

Also in the Book Rooms, but unfortunately in poor light at the bottom of a display case, was a bronze memorial plaque called a ‘Death Penny’ which was issued to the next of kin to all British and Empire personnel who were killed as a result of World War I.

Finally, here are some photos taken around the Gardens, some of which are of buildings and areas which appear in the VPK and Brownie photos.

Click on the above photographs to see them full size

It is, of course, ludicrous to compare the photos taken by cameras made 102 years apart. I will, however, nail my colours to the mast by saying that I like the photos taken by the VPK just as much as those taken by the Leica M10. Ultimately, photographic quality is all about the photographer and not the equipment. Taking that 100-plus years into account, I always point to the photos taken by those two great Antarctic Photographers, Herbert Ponting and Frank Hurley, between 1911 and 1916 and say that today’s photographers would find it very difficult to do better, even with a fine black and white camera like the Leica Monochrom. Many of the battlefield photos in Cooksey’s book are also of a very high quality considering what a humble little camera was used to take them and the circumstances in which they were taken. I would not even begin to compare my photography with that of any of those photographers.

I greatly enjoyed this photographic project. What next for my VPK? Well, I still have one roll of Rera Pan 127 film left over. What I just need is another suitable project for it. Any suggestions would be gratefully received.

This article is dedicated to the memory of Father Willie Doyle SJ, a Jesuit chaplain colleague of Father Browne, who died at the Battle of Passchendaele one hundred years ago today — 16th August 1917. His story is here.

This video gives further insight into photography in the First World War. 

______________

13 COMMENTS

  1. This is so strange. I have just cleared out my mother’s loft and have found one of these buried in my Grandfathers things. He fought at Gallipoli in the 1st world war 😮

    • It is always good to hear about such cameras surviving. Were there any photos with the camera? Jon Cooksey’s book, referenced above, shows some photos from Gallipoli said to have been taken with the Vest Pocket Kodak. One of them shows Australian soldiers on the beach at Anzac Cove. Another one shows two groups of Irish soldiers on V Beach beneath the fort of Sedd-el-Bahr. The Royal Dublin Fusiliers are under fire on the beach and a group of dying and wounded men from the Royal Munster Fusiliers can be seen on a boat in the foreground. If you know the regiment in which your grandfather served at Gallipoli you may be able to find some photos online, showing the regiment in action, as quite a number of photos were taken in that battle.

      William

  2. I just can’t stop looking at these and as I do I recite the poems of Rupert Brooke, this article just knocks my socks off!

    • Thanks John. I should have taken a photo of the extract from Rupert Brooke’s ‘War Sonnet II : Safety’ which is on the floor of the Temple but I was anxious to press on and use the Vest Pocket Kodak. I then left the Gardens by another exit and missed them altogether. Here is the extract:

      "We have found safety with all things undying,
      The winds, and morning, tears of men and mirth,
      The deep night, and birds singing, and clouds flying,
      And sleep, and freedom, and the autumnal earth."

      William

  3. Marvellous article, thank you. The history of photography is endlessly fascinating – humanly and technologically, and you have touched on a particularly poignant area. It was a brilliant idea to combine "real" original imagery with digital "illustrations"! I look forward to following up on your various references. My wife and I were just saying to each other the other day that those of us born in the decade before World War II have a "memory" which reaches back to the First World War and has inculcated a sense of historical process, which our children – not to say grandchildren – seem to be totally lacking.

    • That’s a good point, John. Most people these days have never met anyone who was old enough to have taken part in WWI. All three of my grandfathers (one by marriage, a bonus granddad) fought in the first war. One lost a leg while my paternal grandfather fought at the Somme and Passhendaele and battles between. He was gassed but was fortunate enough to returned in good enough health to carry on running his grocers’ shop throughout twenty years of peace and then through yet another war. Now it is the WWII soldiers who are dying out and there must be few under 90 still alive. With them (and us eventually) dies the personal link that is vital in collective remembrance. Soon, I imagine, they will be as remote to the younger generation as were veterans of the Napoleonic wars and the Crimea to us in our youth. That changes things, but William’s article helps preserve the memory.

      • Thanks John and Mike. I started off with a photography project, but ended up with much more than that. Context is hugely important when looking at the history of photography and, often, the subject matter is even more interesting than the photography itself. Ireland and Britain were having some differences during the period of the World War One, particularly when my father was born in 1916. As this article shows, there was a considerable involvement by Irish people from all parts of the country and of all religions in World War One. Relations between our nations have greatly improved in recent years, particularly following the visit of Queen Elizabeth to Ireland in 2011. At the recent commemoration for Passchendaele, we had a member of the Irish Defence Forces reading out the names of Irish soldiers who had died during that battle. We have, indeed, come a long way.

        William

  4. A very fine and interesting article William – and worthy of wider publication. The Book Room photographs showing Harry Clarke’s ‘illuminated margins’, the Ginchy Cross and Michael Byrne’s and James O’Connor’s death pennies are of particular interest. I’ve just ordered the VPK book from Amazon … many thanks for such an enlightening article … I’ll pass on the link to friends.

    • Thanks Dunk

      I should have contacted the Office of Public Works in advance about access to the Book Rooms. So it was pure happenstance when I met the 3 chaps with an interest in War graves and took their photo. This often happens when people see you festooned with ‘serious cameras’. It was also happenstance that I took my M10 as I would not have been able to capture anything indoors with the VPK.

      I know that you and your friends like to use vintage cameras with unusual set ups. The thrill of getting usable images out of an original condition 102 year old camera, which had never been serviced, greatly exceeds any excitement that one might get from any output from one of today’s digital wonders.

      William

  5. Thanks Stephen. The only thing that is ‘contrived’ here is taking the photos at the nearest World War One memorial . I suppose for my second roll of 127 film, I could take my elderly VPK to some of the memorials in France or Belgium to be closer to the original locations.

    I have received the negatives this morning and they are perfectly exposed apart from some light leaks from the winding incident described above. The main correction which I did was for straight horizons. The viewfinder which twists for landscape/portrait format has a cross shape on it for the two modes and, thus, you are seeing always seeing things outside of the photographic frame. Getting everything straight is quite a job, but you would get used to this after a while.

    As for why the VPK went out of production, I imagine that technology improvements and market demand had something to do with this. The enthusiast end of the market probably wanted to have focussing mechanisms and the mass market might have preferred the absolutely simple Brownie. A bit like today with smartphones and ‘real’ cameras. I don’t think that the autographic feature ever got much use.

    William

  6. Excellent results from the VPK William. the pictures from it do have a first world war patina, even if it is all contrived.

    A really interesting and well researched story, many thanks.

    I wonder what caused the demise of the "vest pocket" camera?

    Bruce Robbins who runs "The Online Darkroom" blog found a Zeiss ikonta (a 120 VPC) in a box at a country auction that had not been noticed, it was in a box with other ornaments and he won the auction, I don’t remember how much.

    To his surprise, the camera was in excellent condition, only the selenium cell in the light meter had expired, so the next few articles on the blog mentioned his trips out to the sunny Scottish countryside, where the Ikonta did some excellent stuff.

    It sometimes makes one wonder how the camera companies ever sell anything, there are so many old cameras out there in the wild that work perfectly and can be had for not much, as Mike was pointing out with his Pentax article last week.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here