Home Features Fuji X: Two years after moving from the world of DSLR

Fuji X: Two years after moving from the world of DSLR

  Storks: X-T2 and 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 plus 1.4TC
Storks: X-T2 and 100-400 f/4.5-5.6 plus 1.4TC

It is now two years since I moved over from my heavyweight DSLR system to the (relatively) lightweight delights of Fujifilm. This is the story of what happened and why.

I sold my Canon gear (5D Mk2 and 6D) to purchase the Fuji X-T10 in January 2016, followed by the acquisition of the X-T2 in September 2016. Using the diminutive 16 MP X-T10 as my sole camera, while awaiting the launch of the 24 MP X-T2, was an illuminating experience. I soon realised that I was having more fun with my photography than ever before. In later 2017, I sold the X-T10 to replace it with the 24MP X-T20.

  Walkway: The odd one out, but would you notice? — one of my last shots with the Canon 6D and 70-200 f/2.8 before selling up and moving over to Fuji
Walkway: The odd one out, but would you notice? — one of my last shots with the Canon 6D and 70-200 f/2.8 before selling up and moving over to Fuji

My lenses now comprise three primes, the XF 16mm f/1.4R WR, the XF 23mm f/1.4R and the XF 56mm f/1.2R, and two tele zooms, the XF 50-140mm f/2.8 R LM OIS WR and the XF 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 R LM OIS WR. I also have both the 1.4 and 2.0 tele-converters for added reach on both these lenses.

  Onagers, X-T2 and 100-400 f/4.5-5/6
Onagers, X-T2 and 100-400 f/4.5-5/6

So what do I like about Fuji and how does the system compare with my previous DSLR life?

The most obvious change is that the weight of camera bodies and most lenses is substantially lighter than their DSLR equivalents. Since I often carry two cameras, this is a major benefit. Just to give two examples of comparable lens weights: the Fuji f/2.8 50-140mm tips the scales at 995g against the Canon 70-200mm f/2.8 at 1490g; the weight of the Fuji 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6 is 1373g against the Canon 100-400 at 1640g. For camera bodies the difference is between my X-T2 at 507g and the Canon 6D Mk 2 at 765g. This weight differential is reflected across the range of cameras and lenses.

  Giraffes: X-T2 and 100-400 f/4.5-5.6
Giraffes: X-T2 and 100-400 f/4.5-5.6

Secondly, and rather surprising for me, Fuji image quality is superior to that from the Canon 5D Mk2 and 6D MkI with my Canon L lenses. In my view, this is due to the larger Fuji 24mp sensor aided by the absence of a low pass filter and presumably, the advances in image processing engines in recent years. Subjectively, in photographic club competitions I have won more “firsts” this season with Fuji than I used to do with Canon — and this includes printing up to A3 size. Less subjectively, it is encouraging that more professional photographers across many genres (weddings, street, portraits, action, landscape etc) are now using Fuji and paying similar tributes to Fuji equipment and image quality: Kevin Mullins, Jonas Rask, Damien Lovegrove and Dan Bailey (no relation), to name but four.

The control layout is also a big plus in my view. Direct access to easy to use controls for aperture, shutter speed, ISO and exposure compensation enhances photographic skills and enjoyment. And the EVF on the X-T2 is extremely impressive. A large, high-definition finder is a potent creative tool since it is responsive to all the exposure and control inputs such as exposure compensation, aperture, shutter speed, ISO and film modes prior to taking the shot. WYSIWYG means WYSIWYG and not WYSIW You Might Get as on the old DSLR. 

  Gull: X-T2 and 100-400 f/4.5-5.6
Gull: X-T2 and 100-400 f/4.5-5.6

The quality and breadth of choice in optics is a clear Fuji advantage. The system lenses are outstanding based on the company’s vast experience in advanced optics for the military and entertainment industries. Certainly, in this respect, Fujifilm is on a par with Canon and Nikon. In terms of numbers, X-mount shooters can choose from 16 prime and nine zoom lenses which far outnumber Nikon’s offering for their DX cameras. In its road map for 2018, Fuji has already announced the release of the XF 200mm f/2 R LM OIS WR telephoto prime lens and the XF 8-16mm f/2.8 R LM WR wide angle zoom lens, both of which are likely to set pulses racing. They are further evidence of the commitment shown by Fuji to ensuring that Fuji X-mount users have the widest possible range of excellent lenses at their disposal.

In-camera processing, in my opinion, is another strongpoint of the Fuji brand. Whether you are primarily a RAW shooter, as am I, or someone who is mainly interested in the quality of out-of-camera jpegs, it is comforting to rely on the very high quality of Fuji camera colour reproduction and the associated “film” modes. Born experience in film, Fuji offers a top-quality conversion, whether it be Provia, Velvia, Astia, Classic Chrome, ProNeg High, ProNeg Standard, Monochrome or the superb Acros black and white. 

  Benches: X-T2 and 16mm f/1.4
Benches: X-T2 and 16mm f/1.4

Finally, Fuji as a company is committed to giving the user the best-possible support and ability to enjoy their cameras for the maximum time. Kaizen is a word meaning improvement and this is what Fuji does for its overall product range and, as one example, for its cameras capabilities via firmware updates. My X-T2 had new firmware last November to upgrade to a new faster AF tracking algorithm, support for the new FUJIFILM X RAW STUDIO software and improved radio flash controller usability. Other manufacturers do this to some extent but Fuji is exceptional, even updating the capability of superseded cameras. For example, even the X-T10 (replaced by the X-T20 in early 2017) has been updated in November 2017 to be compatible with the new Fuji XF80mm f/2.8 LM OIS WR Macro lens

  First Lady: X-T20 and 56mm f/1.2
First Lady: X-T20 and 56mm f/1.2

What do I miss about my DSLRs? I can only think of one item to mention in this category. Battery life on all mirrorless cameras is markedly inferior to that of DSLRs. In this respect Fuji cameras are no exception. A spare battery or two, per camera, needs to be taken in the pocket on any kind of serious shoot. However, this negative feature is in my opinion far outweighed by the benefits of the stunning WYSIWYG EVF on its own, not to mention all the other mirrorless camera advantages. 

As a coda to reviewing my Fuji experience, I took out my 1980 Canon A1 with its 28mm and 50mm primes and 70-210 zoom lens. I shall always have a soft spot for this camera which was the first SLR to offer an electronically controlled programmed auto-exposure mode. I am not actually intending to revert to 35mm film photography but, should I wish to do so, operating the Canon A1 is very similar to using my Fujis. All the important operating parameters — aperture, shutter speed, ISO (ASA as it was then) and exposure compensation — are all directly available. There is a mode dial which switches between aperture and shutter speed priority but that very same dial allows one to vary aperture or shutter speed throughout their full range so this is still very much a direct control experience. However, since there is no WYSIWYG viewfinder and the fact that film remains for me something of a pain, without question I’ll stick with my digital Fuji cameras. 

  Gauges:X-T10 and 23mm f/1.4
Gauges:X-T10 and 23mm f/1.4

I like using Fuji products because I see Fuji as a company that has got its act together in terms of its total package. It has a unified market offering in which cameras, lenses, accessories and software contribute to a coherent whole. It listens obsessively to its customers, both consumer and professional, and it improves its products accordingly. Fuji are also much better than many other camera companies in communicating forward plans such as the regularly updated lens road map..

This is a strategy which is working for Fuji since its sales are growing in the mirrorless segment of the market — a sector which is itself growing, in stark contrast to the overall decline of the total DSLR market. As Thom Hogan notes, in his article “Cheap Cameras, More Shipments”, over the period 2013-2017, “Mirrorless went from a quarter of DSLR sales to more than half in four years.” For Thom Hogan’s masterly analyses of the overall camera market as well as much else besides, see this link.

  Really Indian: X-T20 and 56mm f/1.2
Really Indian: X-T20 and 56mm f/1.2

In praising Fuji products so fulsomely, I do not wish to make out that Fuji is the only brand of mirrorless cameras capable of taking excellent images. That would be unjust to other brands and the images taken with them by those who love their Leica, swear by their Sony, pander to their Panasonic and ogle their Olympus. I hope however that those other brand aficionados may be interested in the reasons why I have enjoyed my first two years with Fuji. After all, some (but by no means all) of the points I have made in Fuji’s favour are also applicable to other brands.



  1. Lovely photos, David. This must be Fuji Fortnight. I agree with everything that you say. There is very little not to like about the Fujifilm cameras and lenses, other than the battery life, which does improve somewhat if you use the OVF on the X-Pro 2. The light weight and the excellent lenses are real plus points, but, for me, the most outstanding point is the excellent traditional handling where all major exposure parameters are instantly to hand, just as they would have been on a traditional Leica M camera. Leica had an excellent layout on the X series cameras, but my reaction to the CL was that this was a step back with the two little wheels and LCD screen on top. I will reserve final judgement until I get my hands on a CL demo, but the Fujifilm cameras have a range of lenses that allow me to replicate what I used to do with my Nikons in a much smaller and lighter package. At one stage I used to tote a Nikon D3 and the ‘Holy Trinity’ of 3 Nikon f2.8 pro-zooms ranging from 14mm to 200mm. I must have had more muscles in those days. Leica has some way to go before it can replicate the range of Fujifilm lenses for the CL/TL. All that being said, I don’t like carrying around bag-fulls of lenses and, for most of my photography today, a Leica M10 and a 35 or 50 Summicron is sufficient for my photographic needs.

    it is good that we have so many choices.


    • William,
      Thanks. I agree your comments on not carrying bag-fulls of lenses around. Although I have three primes and two zooms, my normal kit is two cameras with a lens on each. I don’t use a camera bag when out on a shoot other than as a place to transport gear in the car boot. I don’t carry extra lenses around because I hate changing lenses in wind, rain or dust, with which we are normally bountifully supplied! I prefer to go out and use what I have on camera (s).This may not be using the concept of an interchangeable lens camera to the full and be a bit odd but that’s OK!

      All good wishes to you for a creative 2018.


  2. I’m delighted that your move to a Fujifilm set-up has proved successful David but I’m not sure that I would attribute Club success solely to a move to a 24Mp sensor. You are probably under selling your own ability.
    Some of my own recent successes have been A3 prints from a 6Mp Nikon D70, not that it has pride of place in my ridiculous arsenal of cameras.
    What is clear however is the quality of image now attainable from modern day cameras whatever the make. It really is a case of ‘you pays your money, and takes your choice’!
    You and many of my colleagues are sold on the Fuji system, although for many reasons it is not for me.
    Good luck and happy ‘snapping’ in 2018. You have a fine system.
    Thanks for your post

    Mike B

    • Mike

      Thanks your comments. As a former full frame devotee, I have genuinely been surprised that the image quality of my Fuji cropped sensor equals or surpasses my old kit, as well as all the other mirrorless advantages.
      I agree with you that for image quality we are pretty blessed with many modern cameras. Brand choice is of course a very personal matter so, as you say, many other factors come into play.
      All best wishes for your photography in 2018.


  3. Thank you for that interesting article. Pretty much the same thing happened to me. 3 years ago I also decided to rid myself of my Canon DSLR equipment (5D Mk II and 8 lenses, 3 from the L-series) and switched to a Fuji X-E2 body plus kit zoom 18-55mm and a 55-200mm. What a relief, no more back pains from lugging around that big heavy camera backpack. You are right, the image quality is better than Canon’s because Fuji lenses are top quality lenses, better than many L-lenses, IMHO. One year later I bought the X-Pro2 and added a 16mm f1.4 and a 35mm f1.4. I will never go back to DSLR again, thats for sure.



    • Frank

      Interested in your comments. I share your enthusiasm for the 16mm F1.4 which is a super lens with great IQ. I carry it out welded to my X-T20 and find it serves for landscape, city and even street photography and more. The combination of usable moderate wide angle and crazy close focus where needed is to me irresistible. I don’t have the 35mm F1.4 but it has a great reputation.


    • Wayne

      Thanks. I agree you need both. I have of course produced and will continue to produce a huge number of poor images amongst which is the occasional keeper. We all try to improve the percentage of keepers. I think the characteristics of Fuji cameras (like direct access controls, great EVF etc) assist this process more than did my Canons. But as in any activity marginal improvements in several areas all add up to something better.


  4. Having the perfect image not only means finding it, but also editing it and designing it so that it gets shared on social media, or so that it reflects your brand image.

  5. Very interesting article
    Like many, I still lug the dslr but it isn’t the weight but the sheer inconvenience of it all. I tried the Panasonic M43 a few years ago and whilst initially I was blown away I very soon began to miss the dslr.
    I think my next stage in photography will be via phone cameras. I find using phones so much fun and knowing it isn’t really a camera just adds to the amazement later when viewing shots taken. The best step for me will be camera phone output to photo books
    Simplicity in itself.

  6. Good comments. Camera mfrs both dslr and mirrorless make very little effort to help you download and move images to where you want them whether files on computer, social media or whatever. They are inconvenient as you say whereas phones are much better.
    I am however aiming to upgrade my Fuji X-T2 to the new X-T4 when released shortly so I’m stuck in a rut!
    Keep taking images with whatever!

  7. Lovely article, David.

    I think the strength of the Fuji system is the overall “retro” aesthetic, from controls and layouts to their “film emulations”. There’s something delightfully tactile about them. And of course, they’re smaller than most current Dslr systems – certainly the full frames.

    The X-T4 should be a great piece of gear, but its the X-pro3 thats turning my head in the Fuji lineup. We’ll see what the future brings, but in the meantime just keep shooting!

  8. Thank you Jason.

    Agree the X-Pro3 is a a beauty but no good for me, as my right eye is weak so I have to use my left eye to the viewfinder. On the X Pro3 this puts my nose smack in the middle of the camera rear! Must be X T4 for me.


Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.