Leica’s successful Reporter design series, which includes an M10-P and Q2 and Q2 Monochrom, is now extended to the SL range. Leica says the new camera represents photo and video journalism without limits.

The new SL2-S Reporter features an all-metal body and special armouring made from an Aramid fibre which offers excellent grip because of its rhombuses texture. It is dust and water-resistant, as is the standard SL2-S.
The body omits the Leica logo, and the camera is finished in a matte green which Leica says is very scratch and fingerprint resistant.


In all other respects, the Reporter is identical to the Leica SL2-S with its 24MB sensor and access to a wide range of L-mount lenses.
Initial production is limited to 1,000 units, and the SL2-S Reporter will sell for a recommended £4,700 in the UK (including taxes).
Read more about the Leica SL and SL2 models
PRESS RELEASE
Join the Macfilos subscriber mailing list
Our thrice-a-week email service has been polished up and improved. Why not subscribe, using the button below to add yourself to the mailing list? You will never miss a Macfilos post again. Emails are sent on Mondays, Wednesdays, and Fridays at 8 pm GMT. Macfilos is a non-commercial site and your address will be used only for communications from the editorial team. We will never sell or allow third parties to use the list. Furthermore, you can unsubscribe at any time simply by clicking a button on any email.
It is a beautiful camera. I do wish they had gotten rid of the huge LEICA letters as well. That is the nice thing about the Reporter M. No red dot and no brand name.
Well, I suppose if you are going to remake an original, you can start changing things around. The Leitz badge is a nice touch, though, even though it was seen on the M6 for only a couple of years. There’s always the MP if you want a more discreet body.
Hi Mike, this is the SL2-S reporter article, I was not commenting on the M6, the M6 is beautiful, I was commenting on the SL2-s Reporter versus M10-P reporter, the SL2-S is beautiful, it is just that the M Reporter is very discreet and does not scream Leica in huge letters whereas the SL2-S (still) does.
Sorry, my mistake. The comments have been coming in thick and fast over the past week and it’s become hard to catch up. I agree that the SL2-S is less discreet than either the M10-P or Q2 versions. Both of these look better, in my view. In any case, I have never thought of the SL as a discreet street photography tool. For that, both the M and Q are more appropriate (or dare I mention the uber-discreet Ricoh GR?