Hands on with the Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100 F4 IS Pro

 Subjectively, this new lens feels little different from the 12-40; a bit longer, a bit heavier but neither is a deal breaker.
Subjectively, this new lens feels little different from the 12-40; a bit longer, a bit heavier but neither is a deal breaker.

The Olympus 12-40 Pro is a great lens—it was the optic of choice to go with my Panasonic GX8 for shooting at Photokina this year. But occasionally you are left gasping at the long end with the 80mm equivalent. If only we could have a few more millimetres…..

 80mm portrait
80mm portrait

Well now you can. The M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100 F4 IS Pro brings all the same features and image quality that you get with the standard zoom. It also comes without a dramatic weight or size penalty. In fact, the extra bulk is quite manageable and I could envisage carrying this lens around with little more thought than I give to the 12-40.

The only snag is that the maximum (although constant) aperture is only f/4 compared with the brighter f/2.8 of the 12-40. That makes quite a difference, particularly for indoor shots such as I’ve been taking at Cologne these past few days. For general travel, though, this could be the ideal lens to buy.

There is a current trend to all-in-one zooms, wide enough for architecture in crowded cities but long enough to make you feel you don’t need to carry a second lens. Fuji’s XF 18-135 f/3.5-5.6 is a similar lens which has proved very popular. But, while directly comparable with the new Olympus at the tele end (206mm against 200mm), the M.Zuiko is actually much more usable because of the wider 24mm equivalence. Those four millimetres make a great deal of difference in a tight corner as any photographer will tell you. The 12-100’s constant f/4 aperture will impress in this company too.

I had a brief hands-on with the Olympus 12-100mm at Photokina and noticed almost no handling difference between it and the 12-40 I had been using most of the day. With an improved 5-axis IBIS, the lens is claimed to offer up to 6.5 stops of stabilisation. As further evidence of its all-round capabilities, the 12-100 offers a minimum focus distance of 1.5cm from the front element at 12mm and 27mm at the long end.

Ergonomically, the new lens is identical to the other zooms in the Pro range, particularly the 12-40mm. It features the push-pull focus mode ring which reveals a depth-of-field scale in manual focus mode. In common with the other Pro zooms, this lens is weather resistant to make a good combination with the new OM-D E-M1 Mk II or the Panasonic Lumix GX8 (with which these test shots were taken).

This is an incredibly talented lens and could well supplant the ubiquitous 12-40 for general photography, particularly for travel. I can imagine this lens paired with a good, fast prime will provide all the glass you will need.

The Olympus M.Zuiko Digital ED 12-100 F4 IS Pro is likely to cost just under £1,000 in the UK.

_______________

  • Subscribe to Macfilos for free updates on articles as they are published. Read more here
  • Want to make a comment on this article but having problems? Please read this

6 COMMENTS

    • No, in Fuji-land, 18mm is equivalent to the same field of view as 28mm in 35mm terms. The widest lens Fuji offers at present is the 10-24, which gives a 15mm fov at it’s widest setting in 35mm-speak. To express any APS-C lens in 35mm equivalent divide by 2 and multiply by 3. To do the same for 4/3 multiply by 2.

      Note, incidentally, that I don’t use the term "full frame", which is a misnomer. When 35mm first appeared, it was described as "miniature format". All frames are full frame, some are just larger or smaller than others; there are pros and cons accordingly.

      • Just a couple of notes.

        1. In "Fuji-land", 18mm is equivalent to a diagonal field of view of 27mm in 135mm terms.
        2. If we look at comparable ‘horizontal’ angle of view, or how ‘wide’ on the horizontal scale each lens is then the 18mm Fuji will show the same ‘width’ as a 27mm on a 135mm sensor. A 12mm on a 4/3 sensor will not show the same ‘width’ as a 24mm on a 135mm sensor (73.74) degrees but rather something closer to a 25mm. In fact you’d need am 11.5mm M43 lens to get the same horizontal angle of view as a 24mm lens on 135mm.
        • Thanks for this. It’s a challenge to keep the detail digestible. I tend to use the basic crop conversion since it is more readily understood and doesn’t make that much difference. I also find it sometimes frustrating to have to mention the crop but I always think of readers who are new the photography and get confused by focal lengths quotes for different sensor sizes. But it is useful to have more detail on occasion.

  1. Appreciate your thoughts on this lens.
    Can you confirm that the image stabilization will work with Panasonic MFT cameras, in particular the GH4?
    Thanks.

    • Hi Peter,

      I had only a brief encounter with the lens on the stand at Photokina so I haven’t had a chance to put it through its paces. I see no reason why the in-lens stabilisation will not work with Panasonic, although I’m not sure if it also works with the in-body stabilisation (on the GX8 which I own, for instance). Perhaps it would be a good precaution to check on this before buying.

      Thanks for your interest.
      Mike

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here