Zambia with the Leica M8: Cropped CCD sensor still produces the goods

  The Charcoal Carrier. All photographs in this article by Richard Alton.
The Charcoal Carrier. All photographs in this article by Richard Alton.

Mikeโ€™s recent article about the M8 set me thinking. I bought mine in 2013, with about 500 frames โ€˜on the clockโ€™. We were moving to Zambia and I wanted convenience. Now well used, the M8 is still my main camera for street photography and occasional weddings.

So what do I like about it? 

First, the sensor: Before moving to digital, for many years I used an M3, loaded with black and white film. So I love the sensor, with its CCD chip. Converting raw files to black and white is a pleasure. Some basic adjustments in Lightroom produce a clear, crisp image, although sometimes the result looks clinical to me. Thatโ€™s when I use Silver Efex Pro โ€“ applied sparingly, I find the presets and film effects excellent. But with Google no longer supporting Silver Efex Pro, I shall have to look at alternatives. 

   
  Well Trained Maids
Well Trained Maids

Second, the simplicity of the menu settings: I know this isnโ€™t unique to the M8, but I still appreciate the simplicity. At a wedding last year the official photographer was late and a friend thrust a Fuji X-E1 into my hands. All went well until I pressed a wrong button and upset the autofocus โ€“ then I was lost. With the M8 Iโ€™ve no such worries โ€” I can just concentrate on taking pictures.

Third, its reliability: Perhaps Iโ€™ve been lucky, but my M8 is still working perfectly. Iโ€™ve had no issues with the sensor and the rear screen is as clear as ever. 

   
  Military Band on Labour Day
Military Band on Labour Day

But what about the M8โ€™s shortcomings?

First, the performance in low light: Iโ€™m happy with the results up to ISO 640 (especially in black and white), but after that theyโ€™re not great. For me though, this is a limitation, not a deal breaker. Before the M8, I was satisfied with Tri-X rated normally at ISO 400. And outdoors in Zambia, I can normally leave the M8 set at ISO 160.

Second,the sensorโ€™s notorious inability to cope with infrared light: I got caught out several times, before fitting IR filters to all my lenses. In the dusty conditions of Zambia, a protective filter is essential, so this hasnโ€™t been a major issue for me.

   
  Popular Front Supporters
Popular Front Supporters

Third, the low resolution of images on the rear screen: Not clear enough to check critical focus, the screen is only good for checking composition. But since it discourages โ€˜chimpingโ€™, I suppose the low resolution can be counted as a plus.

Fourth, the viewfinder magnification: At 0.68 I find it a challenge. After an M3, with its 0.91 magnification, 0.68 took some getting used to.

   
  Ice Cream Sellers
Ice Cream Sellers

Conclusion 

With its good build quality and straightforward handling, will I be keeping my M8? Definitely. And would I buy one now, when full frame sensors are the norm? At the right price, I would. Beware though โ€“ like all digital cameras, one day the M8 will just be an expensive paperweight. 

Postscript: I still use my M3 occasionally. And when I recently burnt a hole in the shutter curtain, a new one was found and installed. At nearly 60 years of age, the M3 is still a pleasure to use.

Read more from Richard Alton here

   
  Three of a kind: Zambia Police Ladies
Three of a kind: Zambia Police Ladies

3 COMMENTS

  1. A lovely photo series, Richard, from a very capable digital camera. The M8 is a classic of its genre as your excellent pictures prove. I still have one of mine which I kept mainly for IR photography. I like using a 75,, Summarit with it giving a useful short telephoto equivalent to 100mm. I hope you continue to enjoy your M8 in a fascinating environment.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

×