Home Opinion Mac Anti-Virus: I give in after 13 years

Mac Anti-Virus: I give in after 13 years

23
4

It is now 13 years since I defected to Apple from Microsoft and all its works. After a quarter of a century with Microsoft, from the early days of Word, through the various iterations of Windows, I was never entirely happy. So I was in a receptive mood in June 2005 when a friend told me he had bought a Mac mini for, I think, about £250. His plan was to hook it up to his own monitor and keyboard and give it a try. It was cheap enough, he reasoned, and he could always return it if he didn’t like it. 

  A reassuring message, with
A reassuring message, with “Autopilot” running background checks and automatically removing or quarantining infected files — most of which tend to come in attached to spam email. Enabling web protection in popular browsers (such as Chrome, Firefox and Safari) identifies unsafe sites and warns you to stay away

I had always wanted to see if I could live with the Mac operating system and I visited the Apple Store in London’s Regent Street for the first time. I was mightily impressed. This was a completely new form of computer retailing, so much better than the impersonal stores in what was then the centre of London’s enthusiast computer market — Tottenham Court Road. 

I did the same deal on the Mac mini and carried home the box. Within a few minutes, I had it up and running, using my own peripherals. 

Instantly fell in love with the Mac and the following weekend I was back in Regent Street to buy a PowerBook G4. Since then I have never looked back, not once, and have been totally happy with a succession of Macs, iMacs, MacBooks and MacBook Pros. To complete the story, however, my friend with the Mac mini didn’t like it and he was the one to return his computer to Apple. 

After getting used to the Mac mini and the PowerBook, I started to look into the need for security. A virus protector was essential for Windows users, even then, but I was told confidently by an Apple employee that I would not need protection. 

  The first run of Bitdefender identified and eliminated a dozen of so nasty files, all of them in spam email. Some of them were on backup discs which Bitdefender also checks
The first run of Bitdefender identified and eliminated a dozen of so nasty files, all of them in spam email. Some of them were on backup discs which Bitdefender also checks

Since then things have changed. Macs have become more popular and have now more or less cornered the higher end of the personal computer market. As they have gained in popularity, they have attracted the attention of the bad boys. It isn’t quite the Wild West yet, but it’s wise to think about some protection.

I’m amazed, actually, that I have owned Macs for 13 years and have never, until now, felt the need for additional security. I’ve relied on Mac’s insistence on authorising all programme installations by password, and I have invariably kept the firewall running and used File Vault to encrypt my disks. I also try to be very careful and seldom click on a link on an email unless I am totally sure of its provenance. 

Recently, however, I got to worrying. There was no obvious reason, just a nagging thought that I should do something. A couple of weeks ago I decided to take the plunge. However, not having had a virus protector for Mac, I had no idea what was available. 

Since I have been out of the anti-virus market for such a long time I did the usual research. Most of the old names are still with us, but I decided to downloaded Bitdefender as a trial and set it to work. It isn’t the highest rated system according to MacWorld. Intego takes the top spot, but Bitdefender appeared to suit my requirements well. Readers may have a different focus and it is certainly worth reading MacWorld’s analysis.

I was heartened to see that there appeared to be no malicious code lurking on either my MacBook or iMac. But Bitdefender did identify and eliminate a dozen or so threats contained in deleted spam emails. If I hadn’t been so careful in the past I could well have suffered some sort of attack. 

Bitdefender appears to have no bad effects, such as slowing processing, and I decided to buy the product. I also added in the offered VPN service to make web browsing safer. Bitdefender works in the background and tells me periodically that my Mac is clean. It continues to quarantine or delete nasty files coming in with spam mail. I have also installed web protection for the three browsers I use frequently — Safari, Chrome and Firefox. Bitdefender checks sites for malicious code and operates a traffic-light warning system to make you aware of problems: Red, amber and green. It seems to work well and gives that added peace of mind.

I will now see how it runs over the next few months and, if I am dissatisfied it is an easy matter to change over. But I suspect I will not be going back to the days of winging it without protection.

Do any readers have experiences with Mac virus protection systems to share? 

___________

 

4 COMMENTS

  1. Well done, Mike, better safe than sorry.
    I have only had macs since I retired in 2002 and have run Intego software for many years now. Delighted to report no problems during that time so I must give the credit to Intego. This is very much an area where no news is good news.

    David

  2. Mike:
    Apple products are simply built with more care. I’ve worked in the computer security field for 32 years and people should realize that ‘security’ is simply a signature of quality. It’s somewhat ridiculous to separate ‘cybersecurity’ from the general function and features of a product. When you say something is ‘secure’, all that you are describing is that the device does what it is intended to do, nothing more, nothing less.

    I’ve worked with all of the major vendors quite deeply and left Microsoft (since the original MS-DOS PCs) and Google (Android) products 4 years ago for Apple. I can’t say that Apple products are inherently better, but the care and control in design and development are clearly evident.

    AV are not that great good remedy – they are better forensic tools, unfortunately. But, AV is all that is available to you as a countermeasure… We remain reliant on the quality of OS security policies and enforcement mechanisms built-in by Apple.

  3. I’m really glad for this post, Mike. I have been wonderingly disbelieving for years about running my macs unprotected and felt there must come a time when they would be attractive to the baddies. I have noted Tuco Ramirez’ comment, but think I will probably follow your example. I am about to start up a macbook and had thought I would just use it as a portable photo editing machine and not give it any internet connection. Seemed a bit extreme, so your line strikes me as being better. The Macworld article doesn’t altogether help the non-nerd decision-making process……..

    • Since I wrote this article I’ve read that the Intego package is better and is capable of finding more nasties, It might be worth investigating before you spend your money. Mike

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.