Under the Radar: De-badging my Leica SL3-P with the help of Field Made Company

I’d been eagerly awaiting the SL3-P for months, and when it finally arrived I did what every Leica owner does on day one: turned it over in my hands, checked the finish, and hunted for the red dot. It wasn’t there, of course — that’s the whole point of the “P” designation, a lineage that goes back to the M4-P of 1980 and was revived more recently on the M9-P, the M-P (Typ 240) and now the digital SL and M ranges.

De-badging means no dot, no distraction, just a plain black top plate for photographer who wishes to be more discreet. Except, to my annoyance, that brazen LEICA branding on the viewfinder bulge seemed to nullify all efforts at stealth.

Leica has avoided the emblem that says, “look, a Leica” and left in its place one that says the same thing in block capitals. It felt like only half a job, and I decided to finish the de-badging job myself.

Enter Field Made Co

A little research turned up Field Made Co, a small outfit in Canada that makes precision-cut vinyl overlays for exactly this purpose, de-badging cameras. Their Leica SL3 Stealth Kit, priced at £8, including a choice of finishes, offers two approaches: a “Ghost Logo” in gloss-on-matte that keeps a subtle tone-on-tone LEICA visible only at certain angles; a plain matte black cover for total anonymity. The vinyl is outdoor-rated, the adhesive is permanent but clean, and the kit comes with spares, so a slip during fitting isn’t fatal.

Application took about ten minutes: a wipe with an alcohol cloth, careful alignment against the viewfinder bump, and firm pressure worked out from the centre to avoid trapping air. The result is pretty good, I think, although if I want to be picky, it isn’t perfectly straight. Don’t complain, though, if I’m a millimeter askew because getting the label straight is quite a challenge.

From two yards, the SL3-P now reads as a black rectangle with a lens on the front. There’s no red dot, no white legend, nothing that whispers “expensive German camera” to a stranger on the pavement. It’s a genuinely well-made product, and considerably tidier than the black gaffer tape solution I see so often on photo walks — the sort that, as one of the reader tips collected in Matt Osborne’s “Leica Street Photography Code” puts it, has a habit of leaving “a nasty adhesive residue” behind after a few months in the sun.

It’s a small thing, admittedly, but it changes the character of the camera. The SL cameras, in particular, shout LEICA and, for various reasons, that may not always be a good idea. Apart from the name, the white lettering draws attention. The SL3-P, thus disguised, draws no such comment at all.

There were two options in the pack to cover the LEICA. One was a plain black label, the other was a (black) LEICA embossed “Ghost Logo”, which I decided to add to the camera.

Why bother?

Ask around, and you’ll get two quite opposing views.

The first is about the craft of street photography rather than personal safety. A camera that nobody recognises is a camera that draws less attention, and less attention means more natural, unguarded moments in the viewfinder. A camera that looks unremarkable also spares you the running commentary from passers-by who want to talk gear rather than let you work — a real nuisance if you’re trying to disappear into a scene rather than star in it.

The second answer is about theft, and here the case is much less clear-cut. The theory runs that a camera nobody can identify is a camera nobody can price. A thief who can’t tell a Leica from a super zoom bridge camera has no particular reason to target you over the next person with a camera round their neck.

It’s the same logic that leads some watch collectors to turn the crown of a Rolex to the inside of the wrist. Sceptics, reasonably, point out that a fast lens on a well-built body still looks like money regardless of what’s written on it. An opportunistic snatch-thief working a crowded street rarely pauses to check the badge before deciding a camera is worth grabbing. A blacked-out camera can also read as press or surveillance kit, which is its own, different kind of attention in some settings.

Is there evidence of camera theft?

I did some research, and the answer is that camera theft doesn’t have anything like the data trail that luxury watch theft does. Watches are worn visibly on the street, and in London at least, the Metropolitan Police’s figures — reported by City AM — show more than 5,180 watches worth upwards of £3,000 were stolen between January 2022 and July 2025. Only 59 were ever recovered, a recovery rate of roughly one in ninety.

Robb Report and Stanhope Insurance both flag Paris (watch thefts reportedly up 31 per cent in the first half of 2022), Barcelona (where watches are said to feature in over four per cent of violent street robberies, concentrated around Las Ramblas and the Sagrada Famlia), Rome’s tourist triangle of the Colosseum, Vatican, and Trevi Fountain, and New York’s Times Square and subway system as recurring hotspots. Alongside a string of celebrity victims from Amir Khan to Formula One’s Charles Leclerc and Lando Norris.

Cameras don’t have an equivalent registry, but the anecdotal evidence is not reassuring. In 2022, four armed robbers stripped $178,000 of stock from the Leica store in San Francisco’s Union Square in under three minutes; a New York camera store separately lost $550,000 in a single raid. During the civil unrest of 2020, Leica’s own stores in Los Angeles, San Francisco and New York, along with Chicago’s Central Camera, were looted in what looked like deliberate targeting rather than opportunistic smash-and-grab — and stolen serial numbers subsequently turned up on eBay, prompting the International Leica Society to warn buyers to demand paperwork.

More recently, in August 2025, a Saudi TV crew filming a report on street theft on London’s Oxford Street had their camera stolen mid-shoot — a story PetaPixel ran with the obvious irony intact — while London recorded over 80,000 stolen phones in 2024 alone, one roughly every six minutes. Even a £20,000-plus Arri Alexa Mini vanished from a music-video shoot that same Spring. As one industry commentator put it, camera gear is attractive to thieves precisely because, unlike a phone or laptop, it “cannot be locked by an owner” and carries strong resale value with no serial-number checking at the point of sale. That said, most Leica dealers I know go to great pains to check serial numbers against theft lists before buying in stock.

Whether an unbranded body makes any real difference to that risk is not proven either way. What the evidence does support is that expensive-looking camera equipment, in the same tourist-heavy, high-footfall locations where watch theft is rising, is a soft and valuable target. Leica gear specifically has already shown up in targeted robberies and stolen-goods listings.

My verdict

I’ll be clear about my motives: I did this mostly for my preference, not the paranoia. I actually like an unbadged, unobtrusive design. Furthermore, I thought the Leica SL3-S looked great with its blacked-out LEICA, although the red dot trademark rather detracted from this stealthy image. It’s no surprise I was rather disappointed that the SL3-P retained the bright white branding.

As for Field Made Co’s Leica Stealth Kit, it’s a well-executed, inexpensive and genuinely reversible product, and I’d recommend it to anyone tempted to tidy up their Leica body — or to quieten down a standard model without resorting to gaffer tape. Whether you go stealth for the pictures, for peace of mind, or simply because you prefer the look, I’d be curious to hear in the comments if you have had gear stolen or threatened abroad. Moreover, whether you think a plain black camera would have made any difference at all.

Check the Field Made Co website because they do a whole range of lens cap, battery, and camera stickers for Leica and other brands.

One small point: There is a cheap alternative to covering the LEICA brand on the SL models: a handy felt marker pen. But don’t be tempted. It is difficult to remove the black ink completely and, in a worst-case situation, it could be baked on permanently. And this sort of sacrilege with a Leica body will cost you money when you sell or part exchange. Stick with the stickers if you must enter stealth mode.

What do you think? Is stealthifying your camera a good thing or a waste of time? Or is it over-pretentious nonsense, paranoia or simply ridiculous? I can take the criticism… Join the discussion below.

MORE READING

Make a donation to help with our running costs

Did you know that Macfilos is run by five photography enthusiasts based in the UK, USA and Europe? We cover all the substantial costs of running the site, and we do not carry advertising because it spoils readers’ enjoyment. Any amount, however small, will be appreciated, and we will write to acknowledge your generosity.

Comments: Please add a comment to this article. Our comments section is a thriving community and everyone is treated with respect. In addition, please identify yourself (and add an email address, which will not be published, if you would like to see answers to your posting). Our system will automatically delete any “anonymous” posts on the basis that they are likely to be spam.